Turkish, Greek leaders are sincere and capable of achieving resolution to conflict between their countries: Greek expert

The leaders of Turkey and Greece, fresh from reelection this May and June, are both sincere and well-equipped to resolve longstanding tensions between the two nations as they maintain a recent reduction in tensions, according to a prominent Greek expert on conflict resolution.

On the Greek side, the appointment of pro-solution and liberal George Gerapetritis, close to Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis, as foreign minister to replace the hawkish Nikos Dendias, for example, shows Mitsotakis’ willingness for resolution, Alexis Heraclides told Anadolu.

“The strong mandate he got in the June 25 elections and his profile as a defender of Greek interests also give Mitsotakis confidence and authority to elevate the current positive climate with Turkey and finally resolve the long-standing dispute between the two countries,” said Heraclides, a senior expert on Turkish-Greek relations at Athens’ Panteion University.

He stressed, however, that nationalism and even anti-Turkish feelings are strong in Greek society and politics, and this has been a major obstacle to a resolution between the two NATO allies.

Criticism of Mitsotakis from opposition parties, including the leftist SYRIZA, PASOK, and Greek Communist Party, proves how widespread Greek nationalism is even in left-wing politics, which many times in the past undermined efforts to improve relations with Turkey, said Heraclides.

According to Heraclides, in Turkey, on the other hand, the state of affairs is quite different.

“First and foremost, (Turkish President Recep Tayyip) Erdogan can convince his voters, which constitute over half of the population. And secondly, there are no inherent anti-Greek feelings among voters of other parties in Turkey. Overall, Turkey was always more ready and eager to engage in dialogue, which can lead to a permanent resolution,” he underlined.

For example, Erdogan took serious and sincere initiatives more than once to resolve both problems with Greece and the Cyprus dispute but it was always the Greek side or Greek Cypriots who spoiled the efforts, Heraclides argued.

External factors behind push for resolution

Since the latest major escalation between Turkey and Greece, things have changed drastically in the Eastern Mediterranean and in the world in general, Heraclides said, adding that Washington wants a stronger and more unified NATO in the light of the ongoing Ukraine war.

“Having understood that Erdogan is here at least for another five years as a result of the Turkish election in May, and that tension between Ankara and Athens weakens the southeastern flank of NATO, the US pushed Greece to improve relations with Turkey,” he noted.

Heraclides said that major regional actors such as Israel and Egypt are now normalizing relations with Turkey while the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia are even seeking to elevate relations to a strategic level.

“Against this backdrop, Greece came to the conclusion that the time has arrived for a new reset in relations,” he said, adding that improving ties would contribute to stability and prosperity in the region.

Heraclides also stressed that better relations with Turkey would benefit the Greek economy.

“I’m not only talking about cooperation in the fields of tourism, logistics, or boosting the bilateral trade volume. Greece has things to learn from Turkey, for example, in providing a quality, efficient public health system,” he added.

“By and large, I reiterate that Mitsotakis, like Erdogan, is sincere, and hope that he wouldn’t allow anti-Turkey forces in the country to lead us to miss this great change too,” Heraclides said.